SAFETY OF NON-RETURN VALVES IN INFUSION SYSTEMS IN RADIOLOGY: INTEGRATIVE REVIEW

Marcela Padilha Facetto Azevedo, Rachel Maciel Monteiro, Ana Maria Razaboni, Denise de Andrade, Evandro Watanabe

Resumo


Objective: to analyze, from the literature, the scientific production related to the safety of non-return valves in radiology. Method: an integrative review (IR). The terms used during the search were classified by PubMed, Web of Science and SCOPUS, performed from March 2017 to March 2019. Results: the sample consisted of 139 articles, of which 7 were from PubMed; 7 (LILACS), 1 (CINAHL), 33 (Web of Science) and 91 (SCOPUS). In addition, the reference analysis of selected texts and related articles was performed. In this IR, only 5 (3.6%) studies were selected and evaluated, pointing out a scarce world scientific production in this area. Conclusion: the safety of non-return valves usage in infusion system in radiology is not a consensus yet and depends on various physical, chemical and microbiological aspects.


Palavras-chave


Contamination. Infection. Microbiology. Radiology. Vascular access devices.

Texto completo:

PDF (English) PDF

Referências


Bennett SN, McNeil MM, Bland LA, Arduino MJ, Villarino ME, Perrotta DM, et al. Postoperative Infections Traced to Contamination of an Intravenous Anesthetic, Propofol. N Engl J Med. [Internet]. 1995 [cited 2019 May 16];333:147-154. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199507203330303

Au-Yang MK. Acoustic and Ultrasonic Signals as Diagnostic Tools for Check Valves. J Press Vessel Technol. [Internet]. 1993 [cited 2019 May 16];115(2):135-141. Available from: http://pressurevesseltech.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/article.aspx?articleid=1456854

Yang L, Moan T. Dynamic analysis of wave energy converter by incorporating the effect of hydraulic transmission lines. Ocean Engineering. [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2019 May 16];38(16):1849-1860. Available from: https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0029801811002046?token=3F6B2E08710CCD45C8AE0A9F3FF888BE15D2EDA0F6FFCE217E17840F616933D2FD4440BC6E7D476E506F07698422590E

Potter M, Bacic M. Design and Control of Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulations for Testing Non-Return-Valve Vibrations in Air Systems. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2019 May 16];20(1):98-110. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5733379

Panitchote A, Charoensri S, Chetchotisakd P, Hurst C. Pilot study of a non-return catheter valve for reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections in critically ill patients. J Med Assoc Thailand. [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 May 16];98(2):150-155. Available from: http://www.jmatonline.com/index.php/jmat/article/view/5597

Morita S, Kanefuji T, Hoshi T, Kobayashi M, Suda T, Mizusawa T, et al. A novel technique for biliary biopsy using the sheath of a plastic stent and a non-return valve. Endosc. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 May 16];49(1):9-10. Available from: https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0042-118704

Radke OC, Werth K, Borg-Von-Zepelin M, Saur P, Apfel CC. Two serial check valves can prevent cross-contamination through intravenous tubing during total intravenous anesthesia. Anesth Analg. [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2019 May 16];111(4):925-928. Available from: https://insights.ovid.com/pubmed?pmid=20810677

Vermeulen C, Noury B, Dolle F, Rebergue H, Boisgard R. Microbial Safety Assessment of a Double Check-Valve Patient Line in a Multiuse Contrast Delivery System. Radiol Tech. [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 May 16];87(2):139-149. Available from: http://www.radiologictechnology.org/content/87/2/139.abstract

Krinko – Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention beim Robert Koch Institut. Prävention Gefäßkatheterassoziierter Infektionen. Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung – Gesundheitsschutz. [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2019 May 16];45(11):907-924. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-002-0499-8

El Dib RP. How to practice evidence-based medicine. J Vasc Bras. [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2019 May 16];6(1):1-4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-54492007000100001

Ursi ES, Galvão CM. Prevenção de lesões de pele no perioperatório: revisão integrativa da literatura. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2019 May 16];14(1):124-131. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v14n1/v14n1a17.pdf

Elger B, Kiski D, Diem E, Van Den Heuvel I, Freise H, Van Aken H, et al. Non-return valves do not prevent backflow and bacterial contamination of intravenous infusions. J Hosp Infect. [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2019 May 16];78(1):31-35. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670111000168?via%3Dihub

PHAC – Public Health Agency of Canada. Preliminary report: biosafety analysis of one-way backflow valves for multiple patient use of low osmolar intravenous contrast solution.

Can Commun Dis Rep. [Internet]. 1996 [cited 2019 May 16];22(4):28-31. Available from: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2015/sc-hc/H12-21-22-4-eng.pdf

Cona MM, Bauwens M, Zheng Y, Coudyzer W, LiI J, Feng Y, et al. Study on the Microbial Safety of an Infusion Set for Contrast-Enhanced Imaging. Invest Radiol. [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2019 May 16];47(4):247-251. Available from: https://insights.ovid.com/pubmed?pmid=22353856




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26694/repis.v5i0.8600

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Bases/Indexadores:

Internacionais: CuidenIndex Copernicus InternationalResearch BibleLatindexCrossRefScholar Google; REDIB; PKP Index; DOAJ; MIAR; Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS); BDEnf.

Nacionais: DiadorimIBICTSumarios.orgLIVRE; periodicos CAPES.

REPIS is available in: Publons

ISSN: 2446-7901